ॐ
भूर्भुवः स्वः तत्सवितुर्वरेण्यम्
भर्गो
देवस्य धीमहि धियो यो नः
प्रचोदयात् ||
OM, I adore the Divine Self who
illuminates the three worlds physical, astral and causal, I offer my prayers to
the one that shines like the Sun. May He enlighten our intellect.
I always wanted to be atheist. I wish I was not
bothered about how universe was created. I wish I could blindly accept
what big bang theory has to say. I wish I could be satisfied with the logic of organic
evolution. But I can’t make myself to believe that something as
complex as universe can be created without any intelligence. Did Pentium II
modify into Core i7 by itself? The answer is obvious. Even to modify
small device like processor, we require hundreds of Engineers then how can
we take for granted that something as bulk as universe operates by itself without any
intelligence. Perhaps, we human might never be capable enough to reach the root
but that does not change the fact. However, I still wish I was an atheist. At
least that would save lots of my time I waste on searching the answer in
Geeta, Upanishads and few books of other religions like Gurugranth and Koran .
Thankfully, one of my closest friends is much more relentless than me
in this pursuit. We have been discussing on this topic for more than 4 years
and our discussion still continues without us reaching anywhere near
conclusion. Mostly, our discussion involves his questions, my answers
and his logic that marks fuzziness within my answer. I try my best to answer his
questions but he always manages to find flaws within it.
In course of our discussion, both of us
take reference of different verses from scriptures like Geeta, Bhagwat
Purana, Upanishads and many more. Our entire discussion basically revolves
around 1st statement of Isa Upanishad that says
!!ॐ!!
!!पुर्णमद:पुर्णमिद:पुर्णात:पुर्णमुद्यच्यते!!
!!पुर्णस्य: पुर्णमादाय: पुर्णमेवावशिष्यते !!
Aum
This is wholeness( whatever our
mind can perceive),
That is wholeness( whatever our
mind can not perceive),
Wholeness arises from
wholeness,
If wholeness is removed from
wholeness , that still remains is wholeness.
When I first came across this statement, I was
pretty sure that it must be the ugliest statement I've ever encountered. ‘When
wholeness is removed from wholeness, that still remains is wholeness’,
how in world can it be true? Isn’t it analogous to 1-1=1? Later only, I
realized the depth of it. It ceases the boundary between completeness and
emptiness and tells us that every emptiness is complete and perfect in itself.
Me and my friend ,both of us are in pursuit of
answer to same question. However, our path clearly contrasts. He is
fascinated more towards philosophy of Buddha that clearly denies existence of
soul. While, I am more tempted by philosophy of Krishna that is entirely based
on foundation of soul. The soul that has no birth and no death as Bhagwat Geeta
in chapter 2, verse 23 states
नैनं
छिंदंती शस्त्राणि,नैनं दहती पावक:
नचैनं
क्लेदयंत्यापो,न शोषयति मारुत:
The soul is immortal.
Weapon cleaves it not, fire
burns it not
Water moistens it not, wind
dries it not
I do believe in existence of soul, not just because Geeta says so. The logic is simple. Our body is made up of cells which in turn is made up of biochemicals. Our body is nothing more than the accumulation of such biochemicals .How can abstract entities like thoughts, desires and feelings come out of biochemicals?
There must be something (non matter) within us that gives rise to abstract experience within us .That "something" is what scriptures call "Soul".
It's not ironic that scientists have not yet accepted the existence of soul. I'm sure they will never do.They can prove existence of something that their mind can perceive. Soul is beyond the reach of mind. It can't be touched, seen or heard. It doesn't have taste , nor does it have odor. It simply does not exist for our mind. Anything that is beyond the access of 5 senses does not exist for our mind. Therefore, physical existence of soul can never be justified experimentally.However, our inability of proving something doesn't mean something doesn't exist. Existence of soul is not a hypothesis, it's an axiom . It's like 1+1=2 in Mathematics. Neither can we prove it, nor can we move any further without accepting it.
Alhough my friend and I do not agree in most of
the points, there is one common theory of Hinduism that we both love .It’s
Advaita philosphy established by Adi Sankara ( some scholars believe that lord
Narayana himself propounded it and it came to Sankara through chain of passing
knowledge). Swami Vivekanand, who shook whole world with his extra ordinary speech at International Religion Conference, Chichago, was one of the most
popular propagators of this philosophy. Advaita defines oneness of god. It says
अहम ब्रह्मास्मी
|
I am the supreme one.
अयम
आत्मा ब्रम्ह|
My soul is the supreme soul.
सर्वम् खलुइदं
ब्रह्म |
Everything around me is
supreme in itself.
This philosophy ceases the difference between man
and god and tells that we are not different from god. We indeed are god and the
god is one, we all are one.
How can we all be one? We all are
different, aren’t we?
Shankara explains, “As like single moon has uncountable images within uncountable ponds, we all are the
reflection of same supreme being within different bodies.“
Once my friend asked me, “If we all are god,
what’s the purpose of meditation, why do we need salvation? If we already are
god, why should we attain Nirvana?”
“Suppose
that there is a resorvior with potential of 100 MW, Does that mean we can
electrify a city directly without converting potential energy into
electrical energy?Obviously not. Likewise, Advaita tells that infinite potential
lies within our consciousness. But in unmanifested form. May be
,meditation is the way to extract it. All human are equal by potential but only
few like Krishna, Buddha and Jesus were able to crack the trick to unlock it,” I answered.
Our discussion did not end here. He asked me few
more questions. With my limited knowledge, I tried to answer them all. As
always, I could not satisfy him with my answers. Once again our discussion
ended without conclusion.
Someone had told me that everything from
creation to dissolution of Universe has been scientifically
explained in 5th canto of Bhagwat Purana. I downloaded English
translation of it but I found myself helpless when I came across stuffs written
over there. Everything was written in the form of riddle. It was impossible
to understand anything without guidence of good teacher. Luckily, I found
someone who could guide me, during one of my visits to ISKCON temple,
Buddhanilkantha. He was associated to ISCKON (International Society of Krishna
Consciousness) since his childhood and had received knowledge of Vedic science from Vrindavan, India. I used to tell him about my confusions, he used to solve
those with reference to Vedic scriptures. During our conversation, I
used to feel myself as Arjuna and him as Krishna. It sounds wacky but
it’s one of the sweetest feelings I’ve ever had.
I started getting answers to my questions.
Ironically, instead of clinching my confusion , it made me even more confused.
Then only I understood the meaning of 12th verse of Isa
Upanishad that states
अन्धं
तम: प्रविशन्ति ये अविद्यामुपासते|
ततो
भूय इव तमो य
उ विद्यायां रत:।|
Into darkness enter those who
worship ignorance.
But into greater darkness enter
those who seek for knowledge.
This statements tells that, more one tries to unlock the mysteries of knowledge, more he gets trapped into it. I love everything about Hinduism except the ambuigity it has for the
supremacy of god. Bhagwat Purana tells that Vishnu is the supreme one and he
created Shiva. Skanda purana tells just opposite.
I asked my teacher ,”Can you tell me who is the supreme one between
Vishnu and Shiva?”
He answered ,” Suppose you have two candles of same shape and size
of which one has fire and other does not. If you lit the second one with
the help of 1st , can you tell me which one will be brighter?
“
I became speechless. It was my last meeting with my guru. I had
to go to Karnali region in course of my job to install solar mill in
remote areas like Mugu and Humla. When I returned back, he’d
already left the temple.
I don’t know if I shall ever meet him again. But if I do , then I have one
more question for him.
‘‘In between Vishnu and Shiva, who actually is the 1st candle?"
Frequent conflict between followers of Vishnu and Shiva has always stained Hinduism. There are numerous gods in Hinduism and different scriptures depict superiority of different. But the most authentic of all books, Vedas clearly states that God is one.
एकम
ब्रह्म द्वित्य नास्ते नेह नानास्ति किंचन|
God is one, without a
second.Not at all, not at all, Not in the least bit.
Bramha sutra
एकम सत, विप्रा बहुधा वदन्ति|
Truth (God) is one but sages call it by different names.
Rig Veda, Book 1, hymn 164, verse 46
एकम एवाद्वित्यम ब्रह्म|
God is one without a second.
Chandogya Upanishad, chapter 2, verse 1
A question arises here, if god is one, what about 33 crores mentioned in Purans?
Bhagwat
puran clearly tells that they are not god. They are superior to us ,
that's why they are misinterpreted as god by some scriptures. As like, we
live in planet earth, they live in another planet known as heaven,
ruled by Indra and some day, they will also have to die like we do. Simply, they are nothing more than an alien to us, more powerful and highly advanced though.
Bhagwata further tells that there are uncountable universes, each with
one Bramha, one Vishnu and one Shiva . Bramha lives in planet known as
Satye loka, Vishnu in Vaikuntha loka and Shiva in Kailasha. These 3 form
trinity and are superior to Indra and others in heaven. However, they
too are not god. They live only upto 100 years of Bramha which is
equivalent to 411 trillion 40 billion human years. After this time
period, everything including trinity perishes and gets annhilated into
supreme god, Maha Vishnu who is the limited form of unlimited ,
unmanifested Narayana. In this sense, Narayan is the one and only god.
He is without shape,size and image. He is unmanifested yet omnipresent.
Yajur Veda, Chapter 32, Verse 3 says
नतस्य प्रतिमा अस्ति|
Of him (god), there is no image.
Concept
of God in Hinduism is confusing yet immensely beautiful.
Other religions say that God creates universe. On the contrary, Hinduism
tells that god himself is universe and every single atom lies within God
himself. Meanwhile, it also says that god lies within every single
atom. These two statements seem contradictory but are not. Both becomes true simultaneously if we view every thing as God and
vice versa.
I have read
almost all important scriptures of Hinduism and few of other religions too. I
should have completely understood god by now. No, I haven’t. Had I
understood him, I would not have written this article to logically justify his
existence ,for he is beyond all the logic. If I had understood even a least bit of him, I would not have tried to interpret him with the verses of Geeta and Vedas . In fact, I know nothing of him. I’ll
never be able to know anything about him as long as I try to analyse him with my limited mind. Now, the first thing I need to do in my pursuit is to unlearn everything I have learned till date. Its really tough and dispiriting. I wish I was an atheist. .
.